Show simple item record

dc.creatorBonilla López, Marisela
dc.creatorVan Steendam, Elke
dc.creatorSpeelman, Dirk
dc.creatorBuyse, Kris
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-16T14:35:52Z
dc.date.available2022-12-16T14:35:52Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-09
dc.identifier.citationhttps://www.jowr.org/index.php/jowr/article/view/777es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2294-3307
dc.identifier.issn2030-1006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10669/87939
dc.description.abstractWhile the literature on the effect of comprehensive corrective feedback (CF) on overall accuracy is abundant, the body of work employing such a scope to explore error treatability is not, especially when it comes to blended (cf. Ferris, 2010) design studies. Consequently, this investigation extends the analyses from the data set of Bonilla et al. (2018) to report on individual linguistic features. Specifically, to address crucial amenabilityrelated questions in need of perusal, the present blended design study explores the effect of two types of comprehensive CF (with direct correction and metalinguistic codes) on the treatability of separate grammatical and non-grammatical structures. To this end, a group of EFL learners (N = 139) were required to do editing that involved error-correction, deferred (on a draft), and focused on language as well as to produce two independent essays (in an immediate and a delayed posttest). Main results from logistic regression (to test the effect in revised essays) and mixed-effect models (to test the effect on independent essays) render seven variables that can explain correctability differences: out of those, three have also explained overall accuracy gains (cf. Bonilla et al., 2018), one has not been identified thus far, and three consolidate themselves as relevant factors under other conditions as well. Theoretical and pedagogical implications are discussed.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceJournal of Writing Research, vol.13(1), pp. 31-70es_ES
dc.subjectComprehensive corrective feedbackes_ES
dc.subjectDirect correctionses_ES
dc.subjectSecond language teachinges_ES
dc.subjectGrammatical errorses_ES
dc.subjectNon-grammatical errorses_ES
dc.subjectMetalinguistic codeses_ES
dc.titleComprehensive corrective feedback in foreign language writing: The response of individual error categorieses_ES
dc.typeartículo originales_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.17239/jowr-2021.13.01.02
dc.description.procedenceUCR::Vicerrectoría de Docencia::Artes y Letras::Facultad de Letras::Escuela de Lenguas Modernases_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional