Nonlinear Image Blending for Dual-Energy MDCT of the Abdomen: Can Image Quality Be Preserved If the Contrast Medium Dose Is Reduced?
Loading...
Date
2014
Authors
Mileto, Achille
Ramirez Giraldo, Juan Carlos
Marin, Daniele
Alfaro Córdoba, Marcela
Eusemann, Christian D.
Scribano, Emanuele
Blandino, Alfredo
Mazziotti, Silvio
Ascenti, Giorgio
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to compare the image quality of a dual-
energy nonlinear image blending technique at reduced load of contrast medium with a simulated 120-kVp linear blending technique at a full dose during portal venous phase MDCT of
the abdomen. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty-five patients (25 men, 20 women; mean age,
65.6 ± 9.7 [SD] years; mean body weight, 74.9 ± 12.4 kg) underwent contrast-enhanced single-phase dual-energy CT of the abdomen by a random assignment to one of three different
contrast medium (iomeprol 400) dose injection protocols: 1.3, 1.0, or 0.65 mL/kg of body
weight. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and noise at the portal vein, liver, aorta, and kidney
were compared among the different datasets using the ANOVA. Three readers qualitatively
assessed all datasets in a blinded and independent fashion.
RESULTS. Nonlinear blended images at a 25% reduced dose allowed a significant improvement in CNR (p < 0.05 for all comparisons), compared with simulated 120-kVp linear
blended images at a full dose. No statistically significant difference existed in CNR and noise
between the nonlinear blended images at a 50% reduced dose and the simulated 120-kVp linear blended images at a full dose. Nonlinear blended images at a 50% reduced dose were considered in all cases to have acceptable image quality. CONCLUSION. The dual-energy nonlinear image blending technique allows reducing the dose of contrast medium up to 50% during portal venous phase imaging of the abdomen while preserving image quality.
Description
Keywords
contrast medium, dual-energy CT, linear blending, MDCT, nonlinear blending, 610 Ciencias médicas
Citation
https://www.ajronline.org/doi/abs/10.2214/AJR.13.12179