Logo Kérwá
 

Removal of pesticides and ecotoxicological changes during the simultaneous treatment of triazines and chlorpyrifos in biomixtures

dc.creatorLizano Fallas, Verónica
dc.creatorMasís Mora, Mario Alberto
dc.creatorEspinoza Villalobos, David
dc.creatorLizano Brenes, Michelle
dc.creatorRodríguez Rodríguez, Carlos E.
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-02T21:22:53Z
dc.date.available2024-01-02T21:22:53Z
dc.date.issued2017-09
dc.description.abstractBiopurification systems constitute a biological approach for the treatment of pesticide-containing wastewaters produced in agricultural activities, and contain an active core called biomixture. This work evaluated the performance of a biomixture to remove and detoxify a combination of three triazine herbicides (atrazine/terbuthylazine/terbutryn) and one insecticide (chlorpyrifos), and this efficiency was compared with dissipation in soil alone. The potential enhancement of the process was also assayed by bioaugmentation with the ligninolytic fungi Trametes versicolor. Globally, the non-bioaugmented biomixture exhibited faster pesticide removal than soil, but only in the first stages of the treatment. After 20 d, the largest pesticide removal was achieved in the biomixture, while significant removal was detected only for chlorpyrifos in soil. However, after 60 d the removal values in soil matched those achieved in the biomixture for all the pesticides. The bioaugmentation failed to enhance, and even significantly decreased the biomixture removal capacity. Final removal values were 82.8% (non-bioaugmented biomixture), 43.8% (fungal bioaugmented biomixture), and 84.7% (soil). The ecotoxicological analysis revealed rapid detoxification (from 100 to 170 TU to <1 TU in 20 d) towards Daphnia magna in the biomixture and soil, and slower in the bioaugmented biomixture, coinciding with pesticide removal. On the contrary, despite important herbicide elimination, no clear detoxification patterns were observed in the phytotoxicity towards Lactuca sativa. Findings suggest that the proposed biomixture is useful for fast removal of the target pesticides; even though soil also removes the agrochemicals, longer periods would be required. On the other hand, the use of fungal bioaugmentation is discouraged in this matrix.es_ES
dc.description.procedenceUCR::Vicerrectoría de Investigación::Unidades de Investigación::Ciencias Básicas::Centro en Investigación en Contaminación Ambiental (CICA)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad de Costa Rica/[802-B4-503]/UCR/Costa Ricaes_ES
dc.identifier.citationhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653517306896es_ES
dc.identifier.codproyecto802-B4-503
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.147
dc.identifier.issn1879-1298
dc.identifier.issn0045-6535
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10669/90673
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.rightsacceso embargado
dc.sourceChemosphere, vol.182, pp.106-113es_ES
dc.subjectBiomixturees_ES
dc.subjectBioaugmentationes_ES
dc.subjectPESTICIDEes_ES
dc.subjectTOXICOLOGYes_ES
dc.subjectDegradationes_ES
dc.titleRemoval of pesticides and ecotoxicological changes during the simultaneous treatment of triazines and chlorpyrifos in biomixtureses_ES
dc.typeartículo originales_ES

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Removal of pesticides and ecotoxicological changes during the simultaneous treatment of triazines and chlorpyrifos in biomixtures.pdf
Size:
387.73 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.5 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections